White House leaking controversy
The Washington Post report says that according to White House it has no evidence of wrongdoing by Bush adviser Karl Rove or others and therefore no reason to begin an internal investigation. This is of course after CIA operative's name was divulged in an effort to discredit her husband, a prominent critic of Bush's Iraq policy. The controvery is whether part of the administration had leaked to journalist about the wife of prominent Bush critic is working for CIA. Wilson said yesterday that he believes Rove "at a minimum condoned the leak," but said he has no evidence Rove was the original leaker.

Uh oh and you thought only PM Blair and Company has leaking problems! Sheesh.The controversy doesn't really do Bush favor cos elections coming up and anything that might seen as something to hold against adminstrative failure or crises can be potential weapon by those who are going to run up againsthim come 2004. But there's more to the White house controversy than just leaking names I suppose. Uhm and Bush wows action too